Basic Principle of Healing
I’m assuming here that you’ve watched the video
and I have taken for granted you’ve understood the basic ideas.
What I missed out in this video that’s relatively important is the treatment of trauma. I didn’t have enough time in this presentation. If you doubt the effectiveness of this new technology in trauma then watch www.arhf.nl
I’m going to write in a way that you could say is simplistic but what I’m really doing is simplifying the discussion down to its very core. So if you find yourself saying internally, what if, I disagree, what about, please read on anyway.
I’m saying this from a perspective of being a homeopath for 40 years.
What I am saying is that conventional medicine and homeopathic medicine are in complete agreement in many things including the diagnosing diseases and treating infectious diseases.
Both conventional medicine and homeopathy are seeking with infectious diseases to eradicate the germ, the infectious mechanism. Conventional medicine describes it as attacking the germ, and homeopathy describes it as treating the totality of the infectious disease, which in turn actually means mobilising the immune system to attack the germ, and they are both essentially speaking about the same idea. They do it in different ways but the core idea is the same.
Both conventional and homeopathic medicine rely essentially on the herbal, mineral and natural traditions of medicine for its sources of medicines, most commonly salts and herbs.
Both conventional and homeopathic medicines do work when there are physical substances in the actual medicines, even though homeopathy frequently seemingly dilutes the medicines out of physical existence (but that’s just a misunderstanding). This dilution out of physical existence is not necessary, and homeopathy works very well and possibly just as well or even better sometimes, when there is physical content to the medicine. There are systems of prescribing within homeopathy which exclusively rely on remedies with dilute but still physical content, and these are just as effective as those without physical content. So the argument about homeopathy having nothing in it is specious and irrelevant.
As I pointed out in the video, animals intuitively know which plant to eat to heal their wounds and illnesses, and we as humans inherited this intuitive knowing when we progress from out of the animal kingdom.
And this intuitive knowing is essentially the principle of what something can cause it can cure, which homeopathy has summarised as like cures likes like.
There has been a slight divergences in approach over the last centuries between the two systems of medicine, because the conventional medical system has moved away slowly from this like cures like basic principle behind natural medicine. Doing this means its ignoring a billion year tested paradigm, and has no other guiding principle.
Before last century the sources of homeopathic medicines and conventional medicines were virtually identical and this can be seen in the Merck Manual of diseases of 1899 which is still in print, and any corresponding homeopathic materia medica and repertory of the same era, Boerike for example. The only difference is that conventional medicine used the crude substances in physical doses, but so did homeopathy in the beginning.
It’s important to realise that the choice of substances has been refined through a billion year history, from when life evolved on Earth. So the actual substances are not chosen by accident, these are the survival of the fittest and most appropriate medicines for supporting life on Earth.
The only reason homeopathy started using minute but highly effective doses was that it had the same effect but got rid of the toxic effects.
In the 20th century what conventional medicine did (and still does) was to use the herbs and similar medicinal sources, but find out the active ingredients within the herb etc, and then synthesise these in the laboratory, which enabled patents to be issued, and this became a powerful business model and a way of huge profits.
Expert within the industry in the 20th century described it as a huge scam at the time because the herb etc with its natural environment of surrounding nutrients was always going to be better than the synthetic version. The second level scam was 'me too' copycat drugs that doubled the patent life without really improving the benefit, and ruthless advertising manipulation doctors and patients to change over.
Basically it was driven by greed and when you have money you can manipulate health-care relentlessly which is what has been going on. Normal stuff in the materialistic world.
The second point conventional pharmacy stuck to was that they wanted there to be physical ingredients, and they didn’t like diluting seemingly out of existence again because this is a very bad business model. However the very reason homeopathy diverged from physical material substances in quantity was that they create toxic effects. And very frequently the toxic effects become bigger than the disease, and it’s is crafting upon the person a separate disease due to the toxins. This is very frequently seen in medicinal practice, it’s the rule if you take a medicine for any length of time, and it’s quite simply addressed by reducing the quantity and potentisation. Quantity is not important, except within a business model.
But in reality even today some conventional medicines are prescribed in an exactly similar way and form and dilution to homeopathic medicines. Colchicum for example.
So you will already be struck by the amazing similarity between these two systems of medicine.
One further step is to understand that conventional medicines and homeopathic medicines only work to the extent that they are like cures like in operation.
In an infectious disease it is common for a few homeopathic remedies selected appropriate to the person to cure the disease in everybody in a situation like influenza. There are statistics for 1918 influenza epidemic giving the facts on this in tens of thousands of people. If all these were put together in one bottle, which is completely feasible, one composite medicine would treat everyone with the disease. Without side-effects. There are well established homeopathic combinations and homeopathic pharmacies that sell little else.
Conventional medicine turns an infectious disease into a one size treats all phenomena, like the proverbial if you’ve only got a hammer every problem becomes a nail, and it doesn’t always or often work that well as a consequence. It will only work when what is offered is sufficiently close to like cures like for it to work.
With classical homeopathy they normally require a homeopath to decide which of the variety of a handful of homeopathic remedies is necessary for the epidemic disease. This takes more skill but it is highly effective. Put them in a bottle and is likely to be the same level of effectiveness with much less skill.
So still we are working on the same premise, both systems of medicine are extremely close when it comes to infectious diseases.
The idea of one remedy for one infectious disease is completely sane and realistic. The only problem is that neither system of medicine, homeopathic or conventional, have ever come up with a complete solution to this problem.
It homeopathy generated bigger profits and had a secure and better business model that was an easy rival to the pharmaceutical model, it would be game over. The superior homeopathic model would win. It’s just as effective, and it’s not toxic.
So this is the nub of the situation.
PC Technology makes a remedy for the totality of an infectious disease that is completely non-toxic and highly effective. It solves the problem that nature has never produced a remedy that covered the totality of any disease since time began. It’s a radical revolutionary new ability to cure infectious diseases.
There is one more step in this discussion. And that is that chronic diseases are in reality slow-moving infectious diseases, and as a consequence the same principles of treating the totality of the disease apply. This means that PC technology applies to all forms of diseases. In the book Homeopathy for Diseases all the details of this are revealed and discussed with case studies.
When it comes to chronic diseases there is still a lot of agreements between homeopathy and conventional medicine.
A lot of conventional medicine treats chronic disease as if it is an inflammation, a chronic inflammation that has got out of control, for example an eruption, an allergy, asthma, and inflammation, et cetera. However the conventional medicine attempt is to stifle, suppress or contain the problem/diseases not to cure it. Palliative medicine at best. And highly profitable as it means taking drugs for life. The downsides however are huge. Drugs for life, toxic effects that reduce your life span and at the same time significantly reduced the quality of life, and most likely an earlier death.
There is another medical scam here. The drug trials are short, long enough to show benefits, but not the toxic effects fully. But patients often take them for life, when the toxic effects become the most important feature and can greatly outweigh the benefits. The scam is only doing short trials. Not to mention only publishing positive ones.
There is a significant body of top expert opinion within homeopathy that agrees with understanding chronic diseases as inflamation, and makes the comment that all diseases including cancers are really low-level infections smouldering away and getting worse.
In fact homeopaths go further than this to generalise that all chronic diseases are really long-running infectious phenomena passing down from generation to generation by the epigenetic process.
Homeopaths been using this idea for 200 years to great therapeutic effect, and this has now been verified by the new emerging field of epigenetics although it’s got way to go on this. We now know that trauma, toxins and infectious disease effects passed down from generation to generation, and 10 generations is not unknown, it has been observed scientifically. And the chronic diseases so-called are really the combination of the effects of different epigenetic effects passing down the generation. In other words all chronic diseases are really slow-moving infectious diseases.
Now that’s a statement of some enormous magnitude. It means that with PC technology we have a solution to every disease, that’s effective and without side-effect. It really is game over for pharmaceutical medicine.
People interested should contact their local homeopath and cite this blog and video, books etc and request help.
Homeopathy for Diseases -www.homeolinks.nl to purchase.